From: Vladimir Prus (vladimir_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-06-19 03:56:35
Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
> Jarl Friis <jarl <at> softace.dk> writes:
>> I think if you would add
>> sigstk.ss_sp = 0;
>> sigstk.ss_size = 0;
>>
>> in signal_handler::~signal_handler()
>>
>> It will not complain about this.
>
> Ok. I've added these lines.
Well, I think I've already fixed the issue on trunk, two weeks ago, in
a slightly more general way:
http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/46159
>> I know, it should not be necessary,
>> because it is disabling the signal stack, right?
>
> Yes. I believe so.
But valgrind does not know that, so will complain if any data passed
to the kernel is uninitialized.
- Volodya