From: Vinnie Falco (vinnie.falco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2024-11-05 06:28:57
On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 10:11 AM Peter Dimov via Boost <
boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I agree with Andrey. Design discussions about a library currently under
> review are supposed to take place on the mailing list. This serves two
> purposes, it helps reviewers who for any reason are struggling to reach
> a final accept/reject verdict, and it can encourage people to review the
> library by piquing their interest.
>
In hindsight I wish the discussions had taken place on the mailing list.
Yet there was far less friction on Slack and ultimately I chose the path of
least resistance, as the immediacy of replies in the moment led to a more
engaging conversation. Perhaps we might explore how these two separate
platforms can be combined to create something greater than each individual
part? Peter how do we fix this?
Thanks