From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2023-02-03 18:05:24
On 2/2/23 1:57 PM, Andrzej Krzemienski via Boost wrote:
> Should the code responsible for the serialization of
> Boost.Optional be part of Boost.Serialization or Boost.Optional? But we
> will certainly not solve it by introducing yet another library. There are
> other ways to solve it, say, through optional headers.
>
This question comes up all the time and had never been been "solved" to
everyone's satisfaction.
> Regards,
> &rzej;
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://listarchives.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost