From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-06-15 16:11:41


Andrey Semashev wrote:

> I see, thanks for the info. I'll see if I can propose ring queues as a
> separate library then.

I'd prefer containers and not queues though. That is,
{push,pop}_{front,back} instead of push/pop. "Ring deque".