Subject: Re: [boost] Pimpl Again?
From: Vladimir Batov (Vladimir.Batov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-05-31 23:36:19
On 2016-06-01 11:30, charleyb123 . wrote:
> ...
> In short, what I like:
>
> *- some kind of "std_pimpl<>" provides a standardized interface, and
> "plumbing"/implementation.
> *- CRTP in the "std_impl<>" allows for a zero-cost compile-time
> implementation-override.
> *- If necessary, implementation can permit "std_pimpl<>" to be
> parameterized with merely a "Foo" declaration.
Seems like the proposed pimpl has it all from the list. If not, could
you please give an example of what you want but the proposed pimpl falls
short. I'll try and see if I can accommodate your case.