Subject: Re: [boost] Review Request: QVM (generic Quaternion, Vector and Matrix operations library)
From: Michael Marcin (mike.marcin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-06-26 22:33:04
On 6/26/2015 1:30 AM, Emil Dotchevski wrote:
>
>
>> Maybe its use as an interop library to stitch disparate libraries together
>> is enough value to include it in boost. But in that case I think maybe a
>> smaller addition to the Boost.Geometry library is more appropriate.
>
>
> I do not think that there is any commonality between Geometry and QVM.
> Sure, QVM operations can be used with Geometry types but they can also be
> used with the types of any other library.
>
What I mean is Boost.Geometry already has adapters for point types among
other things.
You are providing adapters for matrix vector and quaternion types.
It seems like this aligns extremely closely with the adaption part of
your library.