Subject: Re: [boost] Proposal: Boost.Core
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-06-01 12:14:13
On Sunday 01 June 2014 18:54:05 Peter Dimov wrote:
> > Our next target should be the so-called Detail library. Most "detail"
> > headers probably belong someplace else.
>
> In particular, it seems to me that the 'winapi' subdirectory (plus
> interlocked.hpp) should be its own library.
I was thinking about Boost.Config as one of its purpose is to define a Boost-
wide interface for setting the supported Windows version. Although I admit
that many of the winapi/* headers may be updated as Boost libraries are
developed (namely, Boost.Sync).