Subject: Re: [boost] [modularization] proposal and poll
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-06-01 11:42:27
Julian Gonggrijp wrote:
> Thank you for this contribution, Peter! Ideally the HTML report is
> generated from the latter plaintext, of course.
The next version of the program I posted has the option of generating HTML
directly. You've probably seen the output. If not, do look at a few modules;
it's good to have an idea of what our future automated downloader would do
when you tell it to download, say, smart_ptr (in the present state of
Boost).
> In order for your program to provide input for the automated downloader, I
> think it would have to provide information at a coarser level of detail,
> i.e. entire submodules.
But it does provide the information on a submodule level. It just goes into
more detail to explain the dependency, but this additional output can be
trivially suppressed. :-)