Subject: Re: [boost] Respecting a projects toolchain decisions (was Re: [context] new version - support for Win64)
From: Oliver Kowalke (k-oli_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-12-28 05:05:35
Am 27.12.2010 21:05, schrieb Vladimir Prus:
> Dean Michael Berris wrote:
>> 4. Change the review process instead from a
>> submission->review->inclusion process that's rigidly scheduled to one
>> that is less rigid and is more fluid.
>
> I think that the current review process is actually good.
How much libs are in the review queue and how long are they waiting for
a review (my libs are waiting for more than one year)?
The review process is very slow and could be much faster (at least for me).
Oliver