From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-11-06 12:29:33
Peter Dimov wrote:
> Emil Dotchevski wrote:
>
>> template <class T>
>> shared_ptr
>> {
>> ....
>> template <class Y>
>> shared_ptr( shared_ptr<Y> const & sp, T * p ): px(p), pn(sp.pn)
>> {
>> }
>> ....
>> };
>
> This has already been proposed in
>
> http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2005/n1851.pdf
>
> along with a few other features.
Any violent objections against this change? I'm thinking of adding it to
HEAD.