From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-09 07:06:07
Darren O'Driscoll wrote:
> However my post was more aimed at suggestions for possible
> improvements to the Boost.Random library. I notice I didn't really
> get a responce on this.
> Is that because it was all unteresting stuff / stuff which has been
> gone
> over in detail previously, or is that library now closed to changes /
> unsupported?
Improvements are always welcome, I suggest you try contacting Jens Mauer
directly, but in any case you could package up your additions and submit
them as an extension to an existing library.
John.