Boost mailing page: Re: [boost] [config] Why doesBOOST_NO_INTEGRAL_INT64_TdependonBOOST_HAS_LONG_LONG?

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Markus Schöpflin (markus.schoepflin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-08-22 08:41:44

Next message: Daryle Walker: "[boost] Updated version history"
Previous message: Graham: "Re: [boost] Should we add two simple character-to-Unicode converters?"
In reply to: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] [config] Why doesBOOST_NO_INTEGRAL_INT64_TdependonBOOST_HAS_LONG_LONG?"

John Maddock wrote:

> OK, changes in mainline cvs now,

Thanks!

Next message: Daryle Walker: "[boost] Updated version history"
Previous message: Graham: "Re: [boost] Should we add two simple character-to-Unicode converters?"
In reply to: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] [config] Why doesBOOST_NO_INTEGRAL_INT64_TdependonBOOST_HAS_LONG_LONG?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view