From: Florian Stegner (FlSt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-08-11 01:10:04
Rob Stewart wrote:
>From: Florian Stegner <FlSt_at_[hidden]>
>
>
>>Rob Stewart wrote:
>>
>>
>>some_of( n, m, s ) <PRED> x -> is true if more than n and less than m+1
>>elements of s satisfy[...]
>>
>>
>
>I don't agree. Why the strange treatment of the two limits? We
>need to decide whether the count is inclusive, exclusive, or both
>(left inclusive, right exclusive). My assumption has been
>inclusive for both values.
>
Was a mistake in writing. I meant that both are imclusive.
>> From your description of each_of: Your implementation of all_of() is
>>correct. I'm right? And each_of needs to refactored?
>>
>
>My all_of implementation was correct. I think we can eliminate
>each_of.
>
>
I aggree.
Florian