From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-06 05:36:17
Howard Hinnant wrote:
> On Oct 5, 2004, at 6:21 PM, Jonathan Turkanis wrote:
>
>> (I now like Howard Hinnant's suggested "unique_ptr", though he
>> seems to be leaning toward "sole_ptr" now.)
>
> I am sooooooooo fickle! :-)
FWIW, sole_ptr doesn't look very appealing to this non-native speaker. ;-)
unique_ptr isn't much better but at least I can associate it with
shared_ptr::unique().