From: Russell Hind (rh_gmane_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-04 02:35:03
Beman Dawes wrote:
>
> So presumably you would be in favor of changing the default to "no_check"?
>
I'd be happy with 'no_check' as default and as Jeff mentioned, backwards
compatibility wouldn't be a concern for me either. I'm happy to alter
the code.
Cheers
Russell