From: David Bergman (davidb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-05-07 10:08:26
Mr. Abrahams wrote:
> > remark: people haven't said much about the name
> ExternalConcept, but
> > maybe AdaptedConcept would be better? ie this library would be
> > implementing the AdaptedRangeConcept?
>
> A concept whose name ends in "Concept" is as odious as a type
> whose name ends in "type" ;-)
Unless it is a meta concept in the sense of being concept for modelling
types which themselves represent concepts in an automated GP framework
(e.g., a diagramming tool for GP programmers)...
/David