From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-02-03 08:16:18
From: "Andrei Alexandrescu" <andrewalex_at_[hidden]>
>
> That very nicely clarifies the requirements. I don't have time to munch on
> a detailed solution, but let me add this: operator[] doesn't have to be a
> member, which might simplify things considerably.
Nope, it "shall be a non-static member function", see 13.5.5/1. Yes, I think
that the restriction is pointless, too.