From: Gennaro Prota (gennaro_prota_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-11-15 14:42:51
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 13:24:41 -0500, Douglas Gregor <gregod_at_[hidden]>
wrote:
>Most likely, those present either didn't think it was a problem or didn't feel
>strongly enough about the situation to speak up. There really aren't all that
>many good uses for overloading operator&, and it can be a bit dangerous, so I
>would expect some resistence in getting it removed from the CopyConstructible
>requirements. Come to think of it, if not for Lambda's overloading of
>operator&, I wouldn't really care about the issue :)
Hmmm... if you proposed a resolution, could you please publish/post
the text of your report?
Genny.