Boost mailing page: Re: [jamming] RFC: On the future of Jam, "FT Jam" and Boost

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Carlos Pinto Coelho (cfspc_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-07-03 18:21:34

Next message: david.abrahams_at_[hidden]: "Re: Suggested coding guidelines"
Previous message: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] Suggested coding guidelines"
In reply to: Lois Goldthwaite: "Re: [jamming] RFC: On the future of Jam, "FT Jam" and Boost"

How about yam? Still looks like jam ... on the other hand it is also yet
another make ;-).

Carlos

Next message: david.abrahams_at_[hidden]: "Re: Suggested coding guidelines"
Previous message: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] Suggested coding guidelines"
In reply to: Lois Goldthwaite: "Re: [jamming] RFC: On the future of Jam, "FT Jam" and Boost"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view